Post Game: Green Bay defeats San Francisco 30-28

[TW]

You don’t risk injury. It’s just not smart roster management

Sometimes you make that choice. WRs are often return men. My point has always been that you don't draft players that are potato chips.

 

[FlaPack]

Sometimes you make that choice. WRs are often return men. My point has always been that you don't draft players that are potato chips.

I don’t have an issue with return guys. It’s the other 10 and I’m not going to risk a WR coming down on kick coverage like Lazard

 

[TW]

I don’t have an issue with return guys. It’s the other 10 and I’m not going to risk a WR coming down on kick coverage like Lazard

You need guys with speed to be in cover teams. The Packers draft plow horses. Half of them are timed in the 40 with a calendar.

 

[FlaPack]

You need guys with speed to be in cover teams. The Packers draft plow horses. Half of them are timed in the 40 with a calendar.

I don’t disagree with that but I’m not risking injury either.

 

[GBP4EVER]

You don’t risk injury. It’s just not smart roster management

But if it's not starters why not use them?

 

[GBP4EVER]

Though also shows how bad coaching/GM decisons are at TC that you can't keep back end of roster guys which most of ST are made up that could be good ST players

 

[FlaPack]

But if it's not starters why not use them?

Balance depth and need. If they are in a rotation getting 40% + of snaps no I’m reluctant.

 

[GBP4EVER]

I don’t have an issue with return guys. It’s the other 10 and I’m not going to risk a WR coming down on kick coverage like Lazard

You need better gunners on the team

 

[GBP4EVER]

Balance depth and need. If they are in a rotation getting 40% + of snaps no I’m reluctant.

I would consider using guys like Lazard for gunner.

 

[FlaPack]

I would consider using guys like Lazard for gunner.

Hell no. He’s WR 2 or 3. No