- Messages
- 5,889
- Reaction score
- 9,549
IMO the bigger question is, what exactly are you salvaging? Some people think there is a '67 Impala under there when maybe it's just a Honda Accord with a V6.
Trading Aaron Rodgers
- Thread starter ChampionshipBelt
- Start date
IMO the bigger question is, what exactly are you salvaging? Some people think there is a '67 Impala under there when maybe it's just a Honda Accord with a V6.
- Messages
- 4,999
- Reaction score
- 4,273
the dallas game was the first time that he actually looked confident. before that he played scared.
love would have been a top 3 qb in the 2019 draft, imho. in fact, i remember talk on this very forum about how he would be a top qb in the 2020 draft during the time of the 2019 draft. there's no question that his 2019 season dropped him out of that conversation.
- Messages
- 4,999
- Reaction score
- 4,273
nice. i guess what the packers are hoping is that you can get back to the 2018 jordan love who - as sophomore, started all 13 games, completing 267 of 417 passes for a school season record 3,567 yards with 32 touchdowns and six interceptions and was named the mvp of the 2018 new mexico bowl after passing for 359 yards and four touchdowns.
- Messages
- 1,489
- Reaction score
- 715
Matt is a QB guy. He wants to develop Love. Get the footwork down. Get the decision making. Learn the offense. Make it easy with a run first scheme.
- Messages
- 13,774
- Reaction score
- 6,592
You don’t trade up for a game manager.....oh who has he developed? DISCLAIMER: I like the guy as a HC
Last edited:
- Messages
- 1,468
- Reaction score
- 1,530
You are absolutely right, Pack you do not trade up for a game manager. Let me make my point clear in my post with this thread. Love is not Rodgers right now and most likely never will be. My point is taking Love and the draft picks we did is more ML's offense but also suggests to me that they think Love may be able to throw accurate short timing routes, play action off the run, and pick his spots deep, eventually. And you then trade AR in 2 years.
Bad choice of words when I said game manager in my first post.
- Messages
- 13,774
- Reaction score
- 6,592
I see your point and don’t disagree. My thing is the only way you make that move in Rd 1 is for a franchise type QB. That is not LoveYou are absolutely right, Pack you do not trade up for a game manager. Let me make my point clear in my post with this thread. Love is not Rodgers right now and most likely never will be. My point is taking Love and the draft picks we did is more ML's offense but also suggests to me that they think Love may be able to throw accurate short timing routes, play action off the run, and pick his spots deep, eventually. And you then trade AR in 2 years.
Bad choice of words when I said game manager in my first post.
- Messages
- 1,723
- Reaction score
- 1,584
I agree with Pack. I think 1st round should definitely be for guys who have the potential to be game changers. I also realize that we don't seem to draft that way.
If you think you only need a guy who can run the timing plays that are called - a game manager, you can grab him later - and certainly don't trade up into the first round to get him.
I'm hoping this works out. But the Pack needed weapons on defense and offense that were available and chose to pick guys for another day.
STOP with the run first scheme BS..... Gute says it's not true.... ML says it's not. I'll say it again the base in this offense is 11 personal...1 RB...1 TE and 3 WR.
- Messages
- 4,999
- Reaction score
- 4,273