- Messages
- 6,065
- Reaction score
- 5,437
desperate fans grasping at straws.I saw a couple of chats where people said they should have put Willis in to start the second half . . . . .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
desperate fans grasping at straws.I saw a couple of chats where people said they should have put Willis in to start the second half . . . . .
the way i remember it is that gute never made him an offer until after he had a deal with the raiders.Adams didn't want to stay here for the $ we had to offer, it's still a business and we have been cash strapped for 2-3 years.
Remember in this offense he's throwing to a spot and the WR has to be there...if not bad things happen. They taught Love that from Day 1..throw to the spotML with some great comments today.
On the second INT to Baun, he specifically pointed out that Heath was supposed to run that route at 20 yards and instead ran it at 15. It's still a forced throw, Jordan should've just eaten that, but I think what he's saying is that if the WR runs that route where he's supposed to, then that throw trajectory is over the ILB instead of right around his head where he can pick it. Details details details. Bad route running, bad decision.
interesting that ml is publicly assigning blame to a specific player instead of vague "miscommunication" comments. is that a good thing?ML with some great comments today.
On the second INT to Baun, he specifically pointed out that Heath was supposed to run that route at 20 yards and instead ran it at 15. It's still a forced throw, Jordan should've just eaten that, but I think what he's saying is that if the WR runs that route where he's supposed to, then that throw trajectory is over the ILB instead of right around his head where he can pick it. Details details details. Bad route running, bad decision.
Maybe it'll get the attention of the player and WR coachinteresting that ml is publicly assigning blame to a specific player instead of vague "miscommunication" comments. is that a good thing?
If that's true then wouldn't it have been an overthrow? In other words, if the WR was supposed to 5 yards deeper, then the throw to the spot would be further upfield and the ball would track higher. I think the issue was that Love saw him break off the route wrong and tried to get it to him anyway. That itself is a disruption of timing.Remember in this offense he's throwing to a spot and the WR has to be there...if not bad things happen. They taught Love that from Day 1..throw to the spot
The way I remember is that they were in talks and the Pack was going to make a counter based on offers he received. Remember, supposedly, he went to Raiders for family and to play with his college buddy, Carrthe way i remember it is that gute never made him an offer until after he had a deal with the raiders.
Did you listen to the PC? Take 20 minutes or so and check it out if you can. ML can be really good about talking ball and X's and O's. He wasn't calling out Heath. Didnt say his name. He said that the route needs to be run at 20 yards and it was run at 15. Said he saw what Jordan saw and understands why he did what he did. Did not say it was the right thing to do. But he saw the breakdown in what was supposed to happen and understands the intent. He said several times, without being prompted, that the turnovers are unacceptable. I don't consider that calling Jordan out because it's a thing that everyone agrees on right? But it was obviously a bad play and he I think was trying to respect people's curiosity by telling them what went wrong with the whole picture, not just "Jordan love bone-headed pick".interesting that ml is publicly assigning blame to a specific player instead of vague "miscommunication" comments. is that a good thing?