Clark is solid. Daniels got paid and dialed it back. While both could be part of a good DL Packers need to find that stud DL who can take the pressure off those other two.. that would be a good Target in FA if they could find one.I just don't see DL has one of the highest needs; Daniels and Clark are solid, Wilkerson showed flashes, and we have some depth.
IMHO we need an edge rusher (Matthews/Perry not getting it done), Safety, and OL (average starters, no depth).
Packers have spent way more time and effort on def over last 3-4 years with little to show for it ...
Packers HAVE to address OL first and foremost. Without that it won't matter who you bring in.
At this point in a major rebuild no need to spend much on FA . It's not like a few FA adds and GB is off to a deep playoff run. Bring in new HC let him dictate draft and then look to FA to fill some holes if people are available that fit his scheme.
This is why the Packers have to act quick to hire a new HC. So he can get scheme in place and GB can redo draft board and look to FA later.
Makes sense. I cant agrue that but your base guys are not going anywhere. Pass catchers qb and rbs dont change. Young cb are here to stay. That leads to the weak spots that need new life. Ol olb s positions. Dl and ilb always can get better but not a huge hole.It's a major rebuild in the sense that a new HC will have a new scheme. And unless you find someone who is going to do things very similar to MM (in which case why get rid of him) the current roster which was built for MM scheme will need to be revamped. New players with different skill sets are needed as well as getting rid of current players who dont fit, even if they are decent.