- Messages
- 6,072
- Reaction score
- 5,445
they did nothing to address the dl and i doubt the ilb situation is going to be improved. teams with even a halfway decent running game are going to gash our defense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Come on now that's not any kind of improvement. We have issues in the front 7 even MP acknowledged it this week.Keke could show something. Lancaster would be the NT tho.
MP said Thursday they will rely upon the defensive backfield heavily this season.....let that sink in.Not a fan of Taylor at WR think the Packers can and should find better than him. Also think we don't need 11 DB's on the roster either.
You think the Packers might use Greene or Scott as a hybrid LB/S and have them play more run support roles?MP said Thursday they will rely upon the defensive backfield heavily this season.....let that sink in.
I have no idea what they are doing, to be honest.... why in the world ML didn't make a scheme change after the SF game is a mysteryYou think the Packers might use Greene or Scott as a hybrid LB/S and have them play more run support roles?
I have no idea what they are doing, to be honest.... why in the world ML didn't make a scheme change after the SF game is a mystery
Nothing much cut in terms of veteran WR yesterday that might be able to come in and help. Only guy that stood out to me was Donte Moncrief. Besides that there was no one else worth picking up.