- Messages
- 18,351
- Reaction score
- 6,341
Zeke got one when he was suspended by league few years backAssuming the injunction is granted. SDNY has been favorable to the league and technically they are following the CBA. Not a slam dunk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zeke got one when he was suspended by league few years backAssuming the injunction is granted. SDNY has been favorable to the league and technically they are following the CBA. Not a slam dunk
Not in the SDNY, it was in Texas Federal court and was reversedZeke got one when he was suspended by league few years back
Does NFLPA have to file in NY or can they file in a more favorable court?Not in the SDNY, it was in Texas Federal court and was reversed
I believe SDNY.Does NFLPA have to file in NY or can they file in a more favorable court?
Do you set a precedent for punishment at 6 games for this? Probably not. Robinson’s ruling / rational did not fit the length. Not sure what was wrong with appealingNFL is being stupid in many ways on this one.
I believe SDNY.
And then this …..makes an appeal more difficult
NFLPA will say precedent is 6 games and also owners never punished so he should have never be punished at all much less 6 games.Do you set a precedent for punishment at 6 games for this? Probably not. Robinson’s ruling / rational did not fit the length. Not sure what was wrong with appealing
And owners are not given discipline via the CBA and actually there was no precedent for 23 accusations. If that’s their argument they loseNFLPA will say precedent is 6 games and also owners never punished so he should have never be punished at all much less 6 games.
Doubtful. They are following the CBA soWonder though if it will be given to someone told you know what we what done and do it