- Messages
- 13,783
- Reaction score
- 6,616
Your assuming that the other party wanted to settle 2 years ago + no NDA.Watson was smart he would have settled this 2 years ago and had it go away before it blew up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your assuming that the other party wanted to settle 2 years ago + no NDA.Watson was smart he would have settled this 2 years ago and had it go away before it blew up.
It’s probably accurate to a point. Murder might be the exceptionI swear owner could commit cold blodded murder and wold let family keep the team
Watson is yesterday's news
Side story on thisDolphins lose 2023 first-round draft pick, owner Stephen Ross suspended following independent investigation of integrity of the game violations
It's with any media story hot for few hours then onto next thingUntil this news it was. This is on brand for the NFL
No but Ross told Flores about paying him $100,000 per game to lose, but "it was not intended to be a serious offer."? Ok got it. Carry on Mr RossSee though Miami did not rig to lose games NFL said
NFL is being stupid in many ways on this one.NFL to appeal Watson ruling.
So possible he plays this whole season if gets season ban by Goodell but then winds up in federal court and gets a injuction to play while it makes its way through the courts and if it's a dragged out process he might not serve ban until 2023.
Assuming the injunction is granted. SDNY has been favorable to the league and technically they are following the CBA. Not a slam dunkNFL to appeal Watson ruling.
So possible he plays this whole season if gets season ban by Goodell but then winds up in federal court and gets a injuction to play while it makes its way through the courts and if it's a dragged out process he might not serve ban until 2023.