2022 NFL News

That’s what the majority of fans don’t get is that cash out is just as important as cap space
I think the first time I "got it" was when GB tried to trade for Mack in 2018, same year they extended Rodgers. They had the picks, they had the cap space, but (allegedly) the org wouldn't green light two massive payments to two players in the same year.
 
What people fail to understand is that players want contracts based on their past performances. That's used by them to project what they call their "potential for the future."

As a GM, you're hearing that, but you're trying to look at the future, not the past. Too many things can happen, including the player spending the next contract on the IR list more than on the field.

Of course in the process of negotiations, the player is always cognizant of the fact that they want that guaranteed money because it means everything is fine, if they can no longer perform like they did in the past, for any reason.
It’s a win now league and more so if you have an elite QB. It’s much easier to manage things also with a Joe Burrow contract for 3 years.

The “GB Way” is a love / hate relationship for me. I get why you look out 2-3-4 years and manage the cap but on the flip side you can use void years to buy time
 
I think the first time I "got it" was when GB tried to trade for Mack in 2018, same year they extended Rodgers. They had the picks, they had the cap space, but (allegedly) the org wouldn't green light two massive payments to two players in the same year.
And how they looked at it as to structure. Any SB payments can be term negotiated, did GB want to pay out over 2 years and Mack wanted 100% upfront? Who knows. But I remember this situation vividly
 
Structure matters and managing how much you kick the can down the road. Been that way for years. Having a QB on a rookie deal changes the way you spend
Yeah without a rookie QB you will always just kick can down the road then like GB is doing
 
I think the biggest problem with managing the cap happens when GMs and coaching staffs become desperate. They do whatever it takes to win today, and totally disregard the future, knowing that if they don't win today, they'll be gone, before tomorrow gets here.
It's a win now or get fired tomorrow league.
 
What people fail to understand is that players want contracts based on their past performances. That's used by them to project what they call their "potential for the future."

As a GM, you're hearing that, but you're trying to look at the future, not the past. Too many things can happen, including the player spending the next contract on the IR list more than on the field.

Of course in the process of negotiations, the player is always cognizant of the fact that they want that guaranteed money because it means everything is fine, if they can no longer perform like they did in the past, for any reason.
Yep and that's why I am questioning giving out a 3rd deal to Amos after this year he's 30 years old and do you want to pay a 30 year old S top money?
 
I think the first time I "got it" was when GB tried to trade for Mack in 2018, same year they extended Rodgers. They had the picks, they had the cap space, but (allegedly) the org wouldn't green light two massive payments to two players in the same year.
Was it that or was it because the Raiders believed Chicago's picks would be higher then GB's pick so they traded to Chicago.
 
Kupp joins ranks of top paid WR's signs a 3 year $80 million ext with Rams.
 
Was it that or was it because the Raiders believed Chicago's picks would be higher then GB's pick so they traded to Chicago.
I think that was the spin that tried not to make the Packers look cheap.
 
LOL Adams smoking weed again

285737580_10162191019809698_8788968230583192806_n.jpg
 
Back
Top