Wisconsin Football: The good, the bad, & the ugly vs. Michigan

Da-news-now

Da-news-now

RSS Reporter
Reporter
Member
Messages
5,408
Reaction score
311
UW has many issues in the program right now, and yes that's a Captain Obvious answer but not sure you can summarize it any other way. I do know after reading just about everything this morning this is the most heat on a staff since GA last season in Madison and before Barry.

Do I see them firing PC? No. Not at a 3 million buyout, however that staff is going to see changes you would think. He can live through a down year, if it runs into 2 seasons then it changes things. I suspect PC gets a call from Barry this week in an old-timer to HC kind of way.

As to the crux of the problem, I still smell a culture issue along with a key mistake offseason. They retooled their offense to fit Mertz's comfort level etc. This is a common coaching mistake. You rarely make hay by catering everything to one guy. The OL was premade to be a 3 point stance pads low zone blocking team NOT a spread reach blocking team... rarely can you convert that in one offseason and be successful. ( Make the bastard a 5-7 drop QB or cut bait)

Also, those WR are just okay, PC hasn't recruited well there IMHO. Something to watch is he's stolen a couple of top defensive recruits to plug holes on his offense. This is also a mistake and will have future repercussions.

The Big Ten west less Iowa will fix what ails us but the warts are there now, an upset by a lesser team in this next run will probably happen and that's going to sp)

PS

Badgers D is still highly ranked in rushing and Total D , but 80th in points allowed and below average in pass defense.
 
No matter how much you stir the pot, it still comes up as the Badgers not being a very good team, and there doesn't seem to be any cavalry on the horizon that can fix our offense.
 
UW is cheap. Even if PC has another bad year next year he will be kept as the school would have to pay him $3 million before 2/1/22 and $2 million after 2/1/23. I think the earliest the school would be willing to pay a buyout would be after 2/1/24 as then the buyout is only $1 million but that late in the year you won't find any good coach. So it's possible they keep PC no matter what for 3 more years just because of the buyout factor.
 
Bucky Football is in big trouble. Unlike others, I doubt the B1G West fixes it.

I agree with Mark. You don't change everything for 1 kid. And, if this is spreading it out for a dynamic passing offense, I don't see it. To me it appears they decided to change, but then don't have the juevos to let 'er rip. I don't get it, it's bad coaching - strategically and implementing.

About Mertz. I think coaching hurt. I think he was under a lot of pressure and was trying to be to perfect. And, I think at the end of the half he let it go and played. I believe if he hadn't been injured, we were going to win. I'm not saying he was going to be the wonderkid I had been hoping for and dreaming about, but he was going to be a better than we're used to Bucky Quarterback. I hope his injury is not as serious as it sounded.

The offensive line should be ashamed. I'll let Mark talk about the techniques and tactics. But, from an old loosehead prop perspective, you beat the guy across from you. If I got beat as bad as these guys, I wouldn't be able to look at my teammates. Where the hell is their pride?

I notice a huge difference in the operating efficiency of the defense as compared to the offense and special teams. Watch them before snap. You can see the communication and quick adjustments. The Defensive heads are in the game and the play. I'm not saying they're perfect, the opponents have made plays, but at least they appear focused. I acknowledge communication is different on the offensive side of the Football, but they frequently appear lost and confused. Special teams?

I don't know where we get 5 more wins to go bowling.

I believe Chryst should be let go but doubt that will happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TW
I don’t disagree with Marks point that there might be a culture issue, but I think that culture issue is more glaring on the administration and more directly the administration of the football program. Sorry for the long post but the points but Khalif’s points show a deeper issue
First the administration
In AD “search” Rebecca Blank was clear it was her call, well the more I hear the more I question that. #1, why was Alondo Tucker on the committee after the being basically let go from the program? Was he tight with McIntosh? Just an odd add to the committee when he was no longer part of the university. #2 I don’t think that there was much of an open search or for that matter even a “final candidates” list. This IMO the more I hear was more about Barry than Becky. Again not just the UW Way but the Alverez Way

Now the Football Administration
After Saeed Khalif left the program and went to Michigan State he gave an interview for The Athletic. It was pointed and not flattering in many ways to the program, especially the administration of the program, some excerpts, and some telling things as “chain of command”, resources and recruiting

You mentioned before the importance of having resources. While you were here, did you ask for more resources?

Every year.

What was the answer?

“We’re working on it. We’ll get back to you. I need more time.” It was always one thing or another. And I’m transparent. I’m not trying to slam them or kill them. Every year, I was given the task of what do we need? And I would give a different structure every year. Sometimes, I’d give the same structure and just write it up differently just to get back to how do you say the same thing in multiple ways just to make it stick?

Now what I think going forward, ultimately, it’s going to adjust. And I think Coach Chryst is going to fight for what he wants and stand up and get what he needs in there structurally to have a competitive recruiting department. And you have to compete in recruiting.

When you would hear, “We’re working on it,” where did that come from? Outside the football program?

I asked my direct supervisors, and then they run it up the pole. I didn’t have direct access to the AD’s offices. I’d draft different proposals each year and submit them to my direct supervisor and wait for answers



Do you think you changed the way Wisconsin approached recruiting at all during your time?

I think so with some reluctance. I don’t think they fully embraced it. But it wasn’t breaking any rules and it wasn’t causing any additional strain on anybody. It was work that was coming out of my office, so it was kind of let go.

But I think it made them a little uncomfortable. We had to get them uncomfortable to stretch a little bit. That’s what we do with players on the field. We make them uncomfortable so they’ll strain. It’s the same thing in recruiting.

There was a level of complacency, a level of comfort with what was being done. And the championships still eluded them. So we’ve got to get uncomfortable to go to spaces we want to get at.

When you say uncomfortable, do you mean how the program had operated before in terms of speaking up more?

Yeah. You can’t pay lip service and say that recruiting is the lifeblood of your program if you don’t commit the resources to it or the time and the energy to it. It can’t just be words. You’ve got to do it. Nationally, the landscape, the recruiting offices are getting bigger. More people, more resources, higher budgets because it’s a competitive space.

What was the most significant challenge about recruiting at Wisconsin?

Resources. People. The people resources. For as big of a program as it is, the people resources were never committed to it. The best we got was I had a total of four full-time people in recruiting. And then we had our best year ever. And I know COVID hit. But we were the first department to get cut. And we were the only activity that was allowed to go on.

There was nothing going on. You couldn’t play games. You couldn’t do anything. You couldn’t practice football. But we were recruiting. We were doing virtual tours. We were doing virtual platforms. It was activity, activity, activity. The only thing that was going on was recruiting. We were the hardest hit department.

When you say hardest hit, did they eliminate people on your staff?

Cut. Eliminated. Yes. Cut them out. Furloughed them. Took money. I mean, it was a challenge.

With the way college football is, as the same programs get top players, do you think there’s a ceiling on what Wisconsin can achieve in a given class or how high the Badgers can go based on the academic standards, the types of players they recruit and the approach they have in general?

On the outside looking in, is there a ceiling? I would say it is self-imposed. Everybody preaches academic standards. Everybody has an academic standard. There isn’t a school that doesn’t say they’re not an academic school. Some have more challenges getting them in than others. But ultimately, coaches with good reputations for getting kids graduated can get kids in school that they need to get in school and that kid qualifies.
 
Last edited:
Ouch.... From a management perspective, that interview is, well, pretty damning. Sounds like a complete cluster f*** without any real leadership/direction. Just people up the chain pushing papers and shifting blame/responsibility while the lower-level guys bang their heads against the wall.
 
Cheesedog said:
Ouch.... From a management perspective, that interview is, well, pretty damning. Sounds like a complete cluster f*** without any real leadership/direction. Just people up the chain pushing papers and shifting blame/responsibility while the lower-level guys bang their heads against the wall.
Click to expand...
It’s damning yes. More an indictment that it’s more “well that’s the way we always do it” mentality. And it starts with the AD
 
Packinatl said:
It’s damning yes. More an indictment that it’s more “well that’s the way we always do it” mentality. And it starts with the AD
Click to expand...
Does it not start with more of the donors who say ok we are getting to bowl games we are happy and dont' demand change?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top