Packers 2024-25 Season Thread

Rumors of GB interested in Newsome or Horn. Would it make sense to trade for one of them and sign them and cut Alexander in the off-season? Alexander seems to never be able to stay healthy in a season and with his big contract would it be better to look to replace him?
 
Rumors of GB interested in Newsome or Horn. Would it make sense to trade for one of them and sign them and cut Alexander in the off-season? Alexander seems to never be able to stay healthy in a season and with his big contract would it be better to look to replace him?
The point is to have many good corners, not trade one for another.
 
Don't think any of the city leaders who helped build it are around anymore. New mayor and city council don't give a crap about the team just how much money they can make the city and bleed out of the team.
You forgot, they all showed up in Packers gear
 
You forgot, they all showed up in Packers gear
Yeah act like you are big supporters of the team dressing in Packers gear but when push comes to shove they love making money off the team but don't want to work with the team.
 
Yeah act like you are big supporters of the team dressing in Packers gear but when push comes to shove they love making money off the team but don't want to work with the team.
that's politics. it's like one candidate talking about how she will make the billionaires pay their "fair share" while the billionaires all make huge contributions to her campaign. yeah, she'll make them pay her.
 
that's politics. it's like one candidate talking about how she will make the billionaires pay their "fair share" while the billionaires all make huge contributions to her campaign. yeah, she'll make them pay her.
So, here we go again.
 
So, here we go again.
our system is broken, tw. when bloomberg can step in and donate $50 million to a superpac, there's a big problem. it gives the impression that elections can be bought. and by the way, it in't just bloomberg. gates has given even more. there should be laws against this election interference. one party has raised a billion dollars more than the other because of huge contributions from billionaires. don't you think these people expect something in return? the illusion of "free" elections.
 
our system is broken, tw. when bloomberg can step in and donate $50 million to a superpac, there's a big problem. it gives the impression that elections can be bought. and by the way, it in't just bloomberg. gates has given even more. there should be laws against this election interference. one party has raised a billion dollars more than the other because of huge contributions from billionaires. don't you think these people expect something in return? the illusion of "free" elections.
The city of GB is represented by elected officials. The people voted them into office. If they don't like how they handle the negotiations they can vote them out of office. A realist knows the Packers are not Republicans and the city Democrats. Furthermore, the negotiations between the two has absolutely nothing to do with the question as to whom will be our President, or in control of Congress, in January. That's ridiculous to even indicate that.

As far as billionaire support of candidates, that goes both ways. Apparently you've conveniently forgotten Musk and Bezos throwing millions upon millions behind Trump?

End of discussion on my part.
 
Back
Top