Packers 2022 Thread

[Treebeard]

One big question if they're going to kick the can down the road with these salary cap moves: will that result in a better roster than the one that didn't get the job done the last two years? Strictly thinking on another SB run. Of course it should be a very good lineup. But good enough?

 

[Cheesedog]

One big question if they're going to kick the can down the road with these salary cap moves: will that result in a better roster than the one that didn't get the job done the last two years? Strictly thinking on another SB run. Of course it should be a very good lineup. But good enough?

Excellent question. IMO no it won't be good enough.

 

[CaptainD]

One big question if they're going to kick the can down the road with these salary cap moves: will that result in a better roster than the one that didn't get the job done the last two years? Strictly thinking on another SB run. Of course it should be a very good lineup. But good enough?

I personally don't want to pay dead cap and void year dollars in 2024 to pay for a team we assembled in 2022.

 

[rpiotr01]

I personally don't want to pay dead cap and void year dollars in 2024 to pay for a team we assembled in 2022.

As a fan of a baseball team still paying a player who retired 21 years ago, I agree.

 

[Cheesedog]

As a fan of a baseball team still paying a player who retired 21 years ago, I agree.

Mets fan eh?

 

[Mark87]

 

[FlaPack]

I personally don't want to pay dead cap and void year dollars in 2024 to pay for a team we assembled in 2022.

Well that ship has sailed. Jones and Clark have multiple void years

 

[dannobanano]

Does anyone seriously think they can franchise Adams after looking at that?

 

[FlaPack]

Does anyone seriously think they can franchise Adams after looking at that?

No unless they believe that this is fantasy football.

 

[FlaPack]

As a fan of a baseball team still paying a player who retired 21 years ago, I agree.

The good news is the CBA only allows them to push void years to 4