- Messages
- 13,783
- Reaction score
- 6,616
My typo. Thanks for catchingyou've said this a couple of times now and i don't mean to be nitpicking, but the packers traded their 4th round pick to move up in the first. not their 3rd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My typo. Thanks for catchingyou've said this a couple of times now and i don't mean to be nitpicking, but the packers traded their 4th round pick to move up in the first. not their 3rd.
To a certain extent they did add offensive weapons for this years offense. Dillon and Deguara can have as much, and maybe more of an impact this year as drafting a WR would have done.
RB’s, typically, can have an impact right away on an offense, and I’m not trying to disrespect Aaron Jones, but I think Dillon will get his fair share of PT. As for Deguara, they will likely use him more in an H-back role that could give him an opportunity to make plays.
Factor in a year 2 jump for Sternberger, and (IMO) they’ve added offensive firepower that better fits what ML wants to do rather than drafting a WR at #30 who would have had to find a way to earn #12’s confidence which would be nearly impossible in this Covid influenced season.
As much as not getting a WR was a head scratcher the issue remains we are soft up the middle on defense. The DL is weak sans Clark and we still have not addressed ILB. Lazard is want he is. A nice 3 or 4 but he’s not going to make a DC game plan for him. MVS is a one trick pony and who knows what EQ is.i appreciate having someone else with a touch of optimism on this board. sometimes i feel like i'm all alone here.
i will say that if dillon is as good as advertised, that could be a big help. also, based on a few things i've read, i am hopeful for a second year leap by jace. i'm not really sold on deguara and i think he was significantly overdrafted. but i do think that lazard could turn out to be one of those rare udfa gems for us. the fact that fun-chess decided to opt out is a disappointment that makes our failure to draft a good wr even more of a glaring error imho. but it does leave the door open for eq and mvs to step up.
My typo. Thanks for catching
and we still have not addressed ILB.
I’d have been fine with either Harrison or Wilsonwhich gets me back to the point i made about losing the 4th round pick. if they could have used that on deguara (who was thought to be a 5th round pick by most) that would have let them use the third rounder on malik harrison. or logan wilson. or tanner muse. but i would have taken harrison.
which gets me back to the point i made about losing the 4th round pick. if they could have used that on deguara (who was thought to be a 5th round pick by most) that would have let them use the third rounder on malik harrison. or logan wilson. or tanner muse. but i would have taken harrison.
i appreciate having someone else with a touch of optimism on this board. sometimes i feel like i'm all alone here.
i will say that if dillon is as good as advertised, that could be a big help. also, based on a few things i've read, i am hopeful for a second year leap by jace. i'm not really sold on deguara and i think he was significantly overdrafted. but i do think that lazard could turn out to be one of those rare udfa gems for us. the fact that fun-chess decided to opt out is a disappointment that makes our failure to draft a good wr even more of a glaring error imho. but it does leave the door open for eq and mvs to step up.