- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 217
I was actually expecting that someone would find a fatal flaw in my method/idea, and that would be the end of it. But it hasn't happened yet.
I agree that CarAV is a fuzzy measure, but at least it's purely stats-based and mathematical - No subjectivity involved, like on PFF. Also free, and it allows for easy comparisons. All-pros and pro-bowlers get a pretty significant bump in CarAV, and it also weighs premium positions higher, so it does reward extra points to key playmakers. I'm not good enough in math to tear the algorithm apart, so I just choose to trust Pro Football Reference knows what it's doing.
Trade value chart has some outright silly aspects, but somehow it's still in actual use. The 1st overall pick (trade value 3000) is worth 1500 last tradeable picks (trade value 2). It's also almost worth the entire bottom half of the draft. If you kept finding trade partners, you could theoretically fill the entire 53-man roster just by trading the top pick![Big Grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)
I agree that CarAV is a fuzzy measure, but at least it's purely stats-based and mathematical - No subjectivity involved, like on PFF. Also free, and it allows for easy comparisons. All-pros and pro-bowlers get a pretty significant bump in CarAV, and it also weighs premium positions higher, so it does reward extra points to key playmakers. I'm not good enough in math to tear the algorithm apart, so I just choose to trust Pro Football Reference knows what it's doing.
Trade value chart has some outright silly aspects, but somehow it's still in actual use. The 1st overall pick (trade value 3000) is worth 1500 last tradeable picks (trade value 2). It's also almost worth the entire bottom half of the draft. If you kept finding trade partners, you could theoretically fill the entire 53-man roster just by trading the top pick
![Big Grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)