we are a wide zone running team... not power gap. Those guys are not what we need.Please, big unfriendly, strong, smart, bad attitude offensive linemen at their positions - no more frickin projects turning guards into tackles or vice versa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we are a wide zone running team... not power gap. Those guys are not what we need.Please, big unfriendly, strong, smart, bad attitude offensive linemen at their positions - no more frickin projects turning guards into tackles or vice versa.
we are a wide zone running team... not power gap. Those guys are not what we need.
You forget, and you can look back. I called the OL as an issue back in camp.The reason I want those guys is so that we don't have offensive lineman getting blown back past and through Love in pass protection. Our guys are worthless and weak and probably can't give 20.
I'll bet that a good coach could coach - teach the big nasties I'd like wide zone blocking.
Nobody's going to teach worthless and weak how to get balls and a backbone.
I'll defer to your knowledge on all Xs and Os. But, if our offensive line doesn't at least improve from weak tit to tit, we're golfing in January 2026
Don't need to. I agreed with you back then.You forget, and you can look back. I called the OL as an issue back in camp.
They ran a lot of power stuff this year though didn't they? Lot of pulling guards. Eyeball test says ML has been moving away from the wide zone. That said, GB has never drafted an OL over 6'6 and over 330, if memory serves. They have some athletic windows.we are a wide zone running team... not power gap. Those guys are not what we need.
If he runs a 4.3 flat, he's a Packer.NO!! On Everette.... if you don't like Stokes don't touch Everette. Note for all the mockers on here