- Messages
- 13,783
- Reaction score
- 6,616
20% from 3 , 59% FT shooter. No thanks.He's a decent D center I take a gamble
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
20% from 3 , 59% FT shooter. No thanks.He's a decent D center I take a gamble
I am not sure but I rather invest in a vet then a rookie. Hell you even said you would not mind trading for a vet. I swear you have to go against everything I say even when you agree with another person on the same issue.And who? Who do give up and who is a fit ?
Ok whoI can think of 5 guys i take before him
Beauchamp, Liddell , Chandler , Braun , Wendell Moore. That’s based on eye test andOk who
And again who? A Vet is fine but you have to match salaries for a trade which I noted. For MLE yeah fine but trade is complicatedI am not sure but I rather invest in a vet then a rookie. Hell you even said you would not mind trading for a vet. I swear you have to go against everything I say even when you agree with another person on the same issue.
Here is my post / reply on a trade in this threadI am not sure but I rather invest in a vet then a rookie. Hell you even said you would not mind trading for a vet. I swear you have to go against everything I say even when you agree with another person on the same issue.
This is exactly the reason I think anything the Bucks do will include a draft pick, and possibly a player below the seven listed (Starters plus Connaughton & Portis). Breaking up the nucleus of the team that works to fill a need just weakens another spot in the rotation.Here are the issues with Milwaukee making a draft deal for a vet
- Who are tradable assets? Connaughton and Portis are important to the rotation and unless it’s some major deal they are untouchable
- Norwa has little to no value leaving Allen as the only “value asset” and I use value loosely since his flaws are apparent. Lopez might have some market but who plays the post ?
- Any trade would need a salary match per the CBA so if limits pulling it off more difficult
- Luxury tax is already a concern so even taking an expired contract causes issues
- You can offer Hill but who takes that on?
Well this is a win now team get a vet not a rookie who won't help right awyaHere is my post / reply on a trade in this thread
I would not mind that but because of the luxury tax and just cap rules salary’s have to match.
I am not adverse to a trade but based on $$ is 99% impossible. It’s complicated
Will be interesting if Portis comes backThis is exactly the reason I think anything the Bucks do will include a draft pick, and possibly a player below the seven listed (Starters plus Connaughton & Portis). Breaking up the nucleus of the team that works to fill a need just weakens another spot in the rotation.
If that's the case, better to look to the free agency market and pay the luxury tax, if needed. There's no sense in trying to put a band aid on a gushing wound.