Mark87 said:
↑
Actually it was and BG addressed it today. He stated the roster needs to be more competitive than it is...even late in the yr when guys are banged up. He wants it so if your not doing well than the 2 deep guy can come in and take your job. That's not happening with a bunch of UDFA.
To me that statement is reflective on drafting better and getting a higher quality player.
That's fair but BG has an advantage this year over TT in the last 5 years. He is picking 10 spots earlier so the talent should be a tad better. Don't get me wrong. I'm happy TT is gone. I just don't feel like anyone could have done much better draft wise drafting 25-29 every year.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe that the lack of depth was caused by position in draft, quality of the players drafted, and the lack of free agents being signed, to make the team stronger. The Thompson theory of "keep the team young" is fine, as long as the shelves are stocked with quality back ups who are working towards being contributors in the future, not just guys filling out a roster spot for minimum wage. We all know Thompson wasn't in to signing free agents. They cost too much money.
Right or wrong - it doesn't matter. What mattered was that early on, when he got to GB, there were guys at level II on the roster who had the capability of playing the game well enough to be starters. Sherman spent money, to get the best talent he felt he could. Of course, the way he got them created cap hell for us, because we were stretched so thin that we were in a position where new signees were tough to fit into our cap. We were all glad that ended, because we saw the team about to go into a death spiral towards the bottom.
But, as good as Thompson's theory is, it also has it's weakness. Street FAs are rarely better than the veterans, who will command more money. You can live and die on the cheap side of the cap. We've seen it for years.