- Messages
- 18,941
- Reaction score
- 6,653
You don't think though that someone with those other teams would have leaked something about Packers listening to offers?Oh would bet a significant amount of money they have and are
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't think though that someone with those other teams would have leaked something about Packers listening to offers?Oh would bet a significant amount of money they have and are
NoYou don't think though that someone with those other teams would have leaked something about Packers listening to offers?
They take calls on all sorts of players/scenarios all the time...... that doesn't mean they want to move that player etc TODAY. 5 weeks from now they might have a whole different outlook.Meh I am not sold on Packers taking calls on him.
I don't get this at all. Rodgers has said over and over "it's not about the money", and the Schefter leak backs that up. Seems much more likely the leak came from Dunn than from GB.I think GB personally
Just don’t think Dunn or Rodgers have anything to gain by this. Maybe to push a trade but that’s not the best way to do it. As I said before Rodgers holds little leverage but he’s controlling the narrative right now. It’s all about will he report or not. This give the organization cover, “we offered him a significant amount of money , we accommodated his timeline and he said no. We did our part it’s on him now” type press release.I don't get this at all. Rodgers has said over and over "it's not about the money", and the Schefter leak backs that up. Seems much more likely the leak came from Dunn than from GB.
If the Packers though are holding firm on we are not moving you would this not help Rodgers though saying the team can offer whatever they want it won't change anything best thing to do is move on.Just don’t think Dunn or Rodgers have anything to gain by this. Maybe to push a trade but that’s not the best way to do it. As I said before Rodgers holds little leverage but he’s controlling the narrative right now. It’s all about will he report or not. This give the organization cover, “we offered him a significant amount of money , we accommodated his timeline and he said no. We did our part it’s on him now” type press release.
what they say publicly and what they say privately may not be the same thing. A trade is the only thing that makes sense to leak this but its not the way I would go about it publiclyIf the Packers though are holding firm on we are not moving you would this not help Rodgers though saying the team can offer whatever they want it won't change anything best thing to do is move on.
thats possible but why double down on it in that way. Right now he has the narrative, Murphy does not.I think there has been some talk from various people who claim to be in the know suggesting optimism that Rodgers shows up for camp, and I think Dunn and Rodgers are trying to get leverage back by suggesting its not true.
I think odds of him showing up are slim. I think most of people saying they think he shows up are former teammates trying to give Packer fans hope.I think there has been some talk from various people who claim to be in the know suggesting optimism that Rodgers shows up for camp, and I think Dunn and Rodgers are trying to get leverage back by suggesting its not true.