- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 408
Does anyone else get the feeling our front office really has no idea how to play this? It feels like we are going to flounder again like the 80's?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It tells me Arod is coming back and they think this is a SB quality roster… More screw the future we are banking everything in this year. Cause it worked so well last year.Does anyone else get the feeling our front office really has no idea how to play this? It feels like we are going to flounder again like the 80's?
Murphy doesn’t care. He just needs to kick the can down the road long enough so he’s not around when it all implodes.Packers keep kicking that can down the road. Ask the Saints at some point that bill comes due.
Rodgers coming back but they know this is not a SB roster they just have to kick money down the road to pay him his $59 million he's due. GB thought last year they had a SB roster and bit them in ass cap wise for at least next 2-3 years before Rodgers can come off the books.It tells me Arod is coming back and they think this is a SB quality roster… More screw the future we are banking everything in this year. Cause it worked so well last year.
Well if that's the case that means this season and next season as He has to retire July 2025. Could make sense sense Rodgers holds the cards to play thru the 2024 season. If that happens Love is gone and you are drafting a rookie QB or playing some crappy vet to be a place holder in GB. That's when you have likely new GM and coaching staff come in because the team sucks and everyone gets canned.Murphy doesn’t care. He just needs to kick the can down the road long enough so he’s not around when it all implodes.
@KenIngalls
·
29m
Any chatter about the recent Packers restructures being an indication of Rodgers impending return/departure can be ignored. All of their moves so far have been expected & predicted, and have nothing to do with Rodgers. They need significant cap space regardless of where #12 is.
I can't fully agree with you here, at some point it's going to come due and they have to let go of this core. The longer that takes the bigger the pain will be. No one has been really successful in the NFL with this method lately.The re-structures are another thing that I think is overblown. This is the way most of the league has been operating for years now, if anything GB is late to the party. I don't mind them kicking the can at all, as long as it's for players that are worth it. Jaire and Clark are no brainers. If they do it to Bakhtiari, that's iffy due to injury but he played better than I thought last year. Preston Smith? Not worth it but they have a roster hole there so they need him. TT's method of pay as you go was financially sound but IMO ultimately too conservative.
The issue - as it is in so many other ways with this team - is simply in talent eval.
Agree. GB often will overpay guys to keep them. Once Rodgers is gone I fully expect this team to pull a Chicago Bears take a large cap hit in a season by cutting or trading everyone who has a large cap number so in the following season you have a lot of cap space and be clear of those bad deals.I can't fully agree with you here, at some point it's going to come due and they have to let go of this core. The longer that takes the bigger the pain will be. No one has been really successful in the NFL with this method lately.
KC moves their star WR, guts certain spots, and brings in a whole new crew..wins the SB. The eagles cut bait on key guys and retool to get to the SB. Point being the opposite method is proving more effective
I am on board 100% with the talent evaluation issue here and would add our front office seems a bit lost as a whole in my humble opinion.