Wisconsin and NIL

[GBP4EVER]

Ya think. The difference is this is trademarked. Expect deal to be announced tomorrow

Hope more guys are smart like this get their money instead of the school.

 

[FlaPack]

Hope more guys are smart like this get their money instead of the school.

It’s for his own clothing line. I doubt it will take away from Under Armour

 

[FlaPack]

The smart move …he has created an LLC to hold the IP. And he did not have a trademark attorney

 

[GBP4EVER]

It’s for his own clothing line. I doubt it will take away from Under Armour

oh did not hear he was coming out with his own line of stuff. Wonder if he partners with someone like Under Armour or Nike to do it.

 

[GBP4EVER]

The smart move …he has created an LLC to hold the IP. And he did not have a trademark attorney

You don't need a trademark attorney for the logo?

 

[FlaPack]

oh did not hear he was coming out with his own line of stuff. Wonder if he partners with someone like Under Armour or Nike to do it.

Not Nike. No chance UW allows that. As to UA that’s defeats the purpose of NIL. why share revenue?

 

[FlaPack]

You don't need a trademark attorney for the logo?

Not required if you can do the discovery and paperwork

 

[GBP4EVER]

Not Nike. No chance UW allows that. As to UA that’s defeats the purpose of NIL. why share revenue?

But would UW have a choice since he can wear what he wants off the field?

 

[GBP4EVER]

Not required if you can do the discovery and paperwork

Is it pretty easy to file then?

 

[FlaPack]

But would UW have a choice since he can wear what he wants off the field?

Not really. Most NIL guidelines i have seen limit that scope and don’t allow it