- Messages
- 2,982
- Reaction score
- 3,554
OT - If Bulaga stays healthy and keeps playing at the level he has been it's not beyond belief that he might get an extension in GB. Before the season, I would not have said that. But so far, his performance speaks for itself. If they do decide to try and extend him, my guess would be the Packers would structure it in such a way that they could walk away from him after year two with minimal cap damage (that's my way of saying they would fully guarantee the first two years of a 3 or 4 year extension).
If Gute does make a play to keep Bulaga, then OT might not be the top priority in the 2020 draft. I'm liking players like Terrance Steele (Texas-Tech) who can start their career as a swing OT. With 36" arms, he may be better suited for L-OT, so that may be where he eventually lands depending on what the future holds for D-Bak with his next contract extension. Drafting a player like a Terrance Steele would mean that they would likely draft OT again in 2021. Doing so would make sense from both a run/pass standpoint with the new ML offense.
WR - Currently stands out as the biggest problem area for this team. The draft would be the most logical way to address this problem but it's not impossible to imagine that they could shop for a free agent WR as well, but I doubt it would be a marquee type name. Packers need a genuine #2 quality WR to complement Adams and they should be looking somewhere in the first two rounds to find one.
ILB - I can't see them wanting to let Martinez get away, in free agency, unless he is expecting to break the bank. He deserves to get paid, but the question is, "How Much?". There are ten NFL ILB's who are paid between $10M to $18M per year salaries. Is Martinez part of that group? The next nine ILB's paid between $8.5M and $6M per year salaries. How much he and his agent value his worth is going to be the determining factor here. Gute may end up drafting a replacement for Martinez, AND signing a mid level FA as well, should Martinez shop himself out of Green Bay.
TE - Just not impressed with the 2020 draft class, unless some underclassmen declare that boosts the talent pool. Gute may be in the FA market for another TE because I agree that Graham and Lewis just aren't in the plans for the future.
QB - This should be in the higher priority category. Taking a potential AR replacement in 2020 gives Gute cover in three ways. 1) A quality backup should AR go down with injury again, 2) Trade bait for a higher draft pick down the road, should this pick develop properly AND should AR stay healthy and play out his contract, and 3) Drafting now gives the kid 2 or 3 years to learn/develop like AR did under Favre.
RB - Mid-round pick that's someone who has similar skill set to AJ, but I could also see going free agency for someone like Kenyon Drake (who's only 26). Packers need more depth at this position. It's something I harped on back in spring at draft time.
DL/DB - Need an upgrade at backup NT. Can't have Clark playing more snaps than he should. Lancaster is try hard guy, but if you can draft an upgrade.........you do. CB and S have depth/talent to groom, but if there is a player on Day 3 that can compete/ungrade this group then you should take him.
OLB - With Tim Smith and Greg Roberts in the mix, should GB make an effort to extend Fackrell, or draft someone in the bak half of the draft.
I know we talk a lot about drafting players who have played their drafted position's in college rather than drafting and converting (especially DE coverted to OLB), but I thought the draft profile for Za'Darius Smith was very interesting.
Just say'in, if you can identify the traits that would make sense converting a guy, like was done with "Z", then you should not dismiss it out of hand just because it didn't work with someone like Nick Perry.
If Gute does make a play to keep Bulaga, then OT might not be the top priority in the 2020 draft. I'm liking players like Terrance Steele (Texas-Tech) who can start their career as a swing OT. With 36" arms, he may be better suited for L-OT, so that may be where he eventually lands depending on what the future holds for D-Bak with his next contract extension. Drafting a player like a Terrance Steele would mean that they would likely draft OT again in 2021. Doing so would make sense from both a run/pass standpoint with the new ML offense.
WR - Currently stands out as the biggest problem area for this team. The draft would be the most logical way to address this problem but it's not impossible to imagine that they could shop for a free agent WR as well, but I doubt it would be a marquee type name. Packers need a genuine #2 quality WR to complement Adams and they should be looking somewhere in the first two rounds to find one.
ILB - I can't see them wanting to let Martinez get away, in free agency, unless he is expecting to break the bank. He deserves to get paid, but the question is, "How Much?". There are ten NFL ILB's who are paid between $10M to $18M per year salaries. Is Martinez part of that group? The next nine ILB's paid between $8.5M and $6M per year salaries. How much he and his agent value his worth is going to be the determining factor here. Gute may end up drafting a replacement for Martinez, AND signing a mid level FA as well, should Martinez shop himself out of Green Bay.
TE - Just not impressed with the 2020 draft class, unless some underclassmen declare that boosts the talent pool. Gute may be in the FA market for another TE because I agree that Graham and Lewis just aren't in the plans for the future.
QB - This should be in the higher priority category. Taking a potential AR replacement in 2020 gives Gute cover in three ways. 1) A quality backup should AR go down with injury again, 2) Trade bait for a higher draft pick down the road, should this pick develop properly AND should AR stay healthy and play out his contract, and 3) Drafting now gives the kid 2 or 3 years to learn/develop like AR did under Favre.
RB - Mid-round pick that's someone who has similar skill set to AJ, but I could also see going free agency for someone like Kenyon Drake (who's only 26). Packers need more depth at this position. It's something I harped on back in spring at draft time.
DL/DB - Need an upgrade at backup NT. Can't have Clark playing more snaps than he should. Lancaster is try hard guy, but if you can draft an upgrade.........you do. CB and S have depth/talent to groom, but if there is a player on Day 3 that can compete/ungrade this group then you should take him.
OLB - With Tim Smith and Greg Roberts in the mix, should GB make an effort to extend Fackrell, or draft someone in the bak half of the draft.
I know we talk a lot about drafting players who have played their drafted position's in college rather than drafting and converting (especially DE coverted to OLB), but I thought the draft profile for Za'Darius Smith was very interesting.
Strengths
Linear build with well-defined upper body. Plays like his hair is on fire and is more than happy to mix it up with tackles in the trenches. Strong at the point of attack. Can stack and shed blockers using arm extension and power in hands. Will do the dirty work for a defense and is considered a good team-first player.
Weaknesses
Can't bend and trim the edge in pass rush. Stiff hips with limited change of direction. Body is likely maxed out. Traits and athleticism unlikely to excite NFL teams. Not a plus athlete for the position. Didn't churn out consistent production. 4-3 power-end only and might not be a viable pass-rushing option on third down for some teams.
Draft projection Round 3 or 4
Sources Tell Us
"He will play hard for you and has a chance to be a tone-setter in camp, but I don't think he's going to be more than just a worker bee and depth player." -- AFC national scout
NFL Comparison
Anthony Weaver
Bottom Line
Effort-oriented power end with a willingness to battle and fight at the point of attack. He's not big enough to play end in a 3-4, so he'll have to become an above-average run thumper as a 4-3 power end.
Just say'in, if you can identify the traits that would make sense converting a guy, like was done with "Z", then you should not dismiss it out of hand just because it didn't work with someone like Nick Perry.