Targets through six games

TW

Member
Member
Messages
7,425
Reaction score
6,252
Game by game targets through the first six games. Read into it whatever you want. I see a situation where it's Adams 66, TEs 29, and Add'l WRs 31, and of course the RBs, which I haven't included.

Adams, 7, 9, 18, 11, 16, 5
Scantling, 8, 4, 4, 0, 0, 0
Lazard, 4, 0, 1, 3, 2, 5
Tonyan, 4, 3, 1, 7, 2, 3
Lewis, 1, 0, 0, 2, 2, 2
DeGuera 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1
 
Tonyan is not having year like he did last year and I question if it will be worthwhile signing him when he's a FA.
 
Tonyan is not having year like he did last year and I question if it will be worthwhile signing him when he's a FA.
Targets are about the same, 3.3 per game comp to 3.9 per game its the catches per game. I am on the fence since there is no alternative to move on to
 
Targets are about the same, 3.3 per game comp to 3.9 per game its the catches per game. I am on the fence since there is no alternative to move on to

They could draft another WR and effectively move Lazard to Tonyan's role for whatever minimal deal Lazard would be due.
 
Targets are about the same, 3.3 per game comp to 3.9 per game its the catches per game. I am on the fence since there is no alternative to move on to
For what he gives us I am willing to draft one and start him then paying millions to keep Tonyan
 
Also Packers have Daffeny can he be effective enough to do what Tonyan does?
 
Hate to say it but the FA market will have several options to consider outside of Tonyan.

A lot depends on what they think of him inside 1265.
 
Hate to say it but the FA market will have several options to consider outside of Tonyan.

A lot depends on what they think of him inside 1265.
I just dont see them spend at that position, never has been a priority
 
Do not make the mistake of comparing TE targets to WR targets. They're a completely different animal. Targets for TEs are dependent on how they draw coverage, and what percentage of their plays are spent being a primary blocker.
 
Back
Top