okay, i think i did see that article posted here. but i didn't give it much credence for a couple reasons. first, if i am remembering correctly, it came from the athletic, a publication that has consistently shown anti-rodgers bias in their reporting (which isn't shocking since their reporting is designed to appeal directly to the fanbase of whichever team they are reporting on and anti-rodgers grabs clicks and sells subscriptions. second - i tried to remain unbiased while reading it, and again i might not be thinking of the same article, and it seemed to me like most of the rodgers comments (taken completely out of context) seemed to be directed squarely at gute and murphy. i think he actually said something nice about ball though. anyway, haters gonna hate. as soon as the season starts, i think most fans will finally move on from this stuff. i mean, they should move on because what's the point? are they hoping to change the past? are they trying to rewrite history? i think mark is right to shut down threads like this.