Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Owner wanted watson and was willing to wash a year to get him. Also why they only pay him $1.5 million base this year so he only losses very little if gone for the year.I think the Browns live under a dark cloud. No matter what they do, it ends up backfiring on them. I think it's a jinx that dates back to not giving Jim Brown the money he wanted to play that 10th year and beyond. I think he sucked all the good football Karma out of the city as he headed for tinsel town.
But, that's just a guess.![]()
Because they did no due diligence on him and by the accounts listed in the lawsuit looks like Houston was guilty as hell in helping Watson. This may get uglyOwner wanted watson and was willing to wash a year to get him. Also why they only pay him $1.5 million base this year so he only losses very little if gone for the year.
Still Browns get him back at worst for 2023 season. He still is likely a elite QBBecause they did no due diligence on him and by the accounts listed in the lawsuit looks like Houston was guilty as hell in helping Watson. This may get ugly
If it’s indefinite who know. I would he is back in 2023 but if I’m Cleveland I’m pissed if Houston was complicitStill Browns get him back at worst for 2023 season. He still is likely a elite QB
at that point he will have missed 2 full years of football. it's a big askStill Browns get him back at worst for 2023 season. He still is likely a elite QB
I can't see indefinite that's a lawsuitsIf it’s indefinite who know. I would he is back in 2023 but if I’m Cleveland I’m pissed if Houston was complicit
With crappy qb pool might be worth gambleat that point he will have missed 2 full years of football. it's a big ask
On what grounds ?I can't see indefinite that's a lawsuits