Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There were 2 “targeting” calls against Wisconsin in the MSU game almost exactly like the OSU hit. One was upheld one was overturned. It’s just not consistentAs I said last night - the targeting call has been called that way for a few years; the player doesn't have to launch himself, or do anything intentional; any contact to the head is considered targeting - right or wrong.
As for the incompletion / fumble - that could have gone either way. The one thing I wondered - completed pass, pushing him backwards - you could also have said that forward progress had been stopped and blown the whistle - but that's a bit of a stretch of that quick of a whistle. But he never did get a chance to "make a football move".
Both the @bigten officiating supervisor and national officiating supervisor have told CBS Sports that Justyn Ross' fumble and subsequent TD return by @OhioStateFB should have stood.
It was called correct on for field. Botched by the reply officials. Call should have stood. Now back to our regularly scheduled programmingWhich means it was a botched call, because it didn't stand, it was overturned. The reality of this is "when it happened" during the course of the game. It don't matter. It's over.
It was called correct on for field. Botched by the reply officials. Call should have stood. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming
If it’s Pac 12 refs lord help usThat comment is under further review...