Post-game: Steelers Defeat Green Bay
- Thread starter Mark87
- Start date
- Messages
- 5,858
- Reaction score
- 9,471
I don’t think it will be 2026 before Policy starts running things, but I don’t know what changes he will make. I’ve said this before but be careful what you wish for - he is a land development lawyer by trade, he has no experience running football ops at any level whatsoever. He is not at all a guy I would want making football ops decisions and, depending on how things go over the rest of this season and next, he may leave things be.
- Messages
- 6,965
- Reaction score
- 5,762
In a way, this is probably best. That is, if he hires a football guy as a GM, and the GM has control of the football program. I wonder if they might even add another position, to suck of salary for someone "who's a friend," as VP of football operations?
That's a distinct possibility.
- Messages
- 4,611
- Reaction score
- 3,274
He’ll have more pyrotechnics than that
- Messages
- 1,468
- Reaction score
- 1,529
But 4ever makes a great point.
Murphy is not going to retire before the 2025 draft in GB. That is his deal. He will want to be there and see it through. I'd bet my salary that he retires right after the draft is over in 2025.
- Messages
- 16,871
- Reaction score
- 5,223
Do the Packers have the stockholders meeting in early-mid part of July 2025 so they can announce then the retirement of Murphy and the official start of the new team president on the job? Murphy turns 70 on July 13 2025 so I would not be shocked if they did something like that to be his last official thing he presides over.
- Messages
- 1,468
- Reaction score
- 1,529
Matt LaFleur vindicates Packers run defense schematic approach
Matt LaFleur defended the Green Bay Packers defensive approach in his Monday press conference, after the team gave up 205 rushing yards in a 23-19 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers.
www.yardbarker.com
Here is the article. Yes, we can absolutely start questioning ML now. All I have to say is wow.
It looks like we are in big trouble until Murphy is gone and this coaching staff and GM get replaced.
- Messages
- 4,954
- Reaction score
- 4,224
frankly, this is what ticks me off. it means that these next two drafts, when we are likely to have a very good draft position (for us), we have to live with the same old head scratching picks. like 3rd round talent and developmental prospects being taken in the first round for example.
- Messages
- 5,858
- Reaction score
- 9,471
If these high picks don’t work out then i have great news for you - there will be even more high picks in the future for the next GM
- Messages
- 4,611
- Reaction score
- 3,274
I don’t mind ML not publicly going after Barry.. But when you say things that make it seem like you don’t think the DEF plan has any issues and that people are dumb for questioning something that isn’t working… well… what’s Ari Fleischer doing these days?Matt LaFleur vindicates Packers run defense schematic approach
Matt LaFleur defended the Green Bay Packers defensive approach in his Monday press conference, after the team gave up 205 rushing yards in a 23-19 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Here is the article. Yes, we can absolutely start questioning ML now. All I have to say is wow.
It looks like we are in big trouble until Murphy is gone and this coaching staff and GM get replaced.