- Messages
- 465
- Reaction score
- 97
I think the longer he is on the market, the more likely it is that he ends up a Packer. Wasn't that the pattern with both Woodson and Peppers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes and no. Woodson wanted to play cb. GB was only team to give him that option. As to Peppers he wanted to play LB. Much the same.I think the longer he is on the market, the more likely it is that he ends up a Packer. Wasn't that the pattern with both Woodson and Peppers?
I think the longer he is on the market, the more likely it is that he ends up a Packer. Wasn't that the pattern with both Woodson and Peppers?
IMO, yes we should be that desperate to sign an ILB. To me it is a clear area of weakness on the team. Quite possibly the biggest area of weakness. I'm not sold that Dansby is a upgrade but I believe he could potentially be one and at a couple million per year I am more than willing to make that gamble.Only way I go 2 years is with a team option for year 2. He 35 in November. Tops year 1 is $1.5m I'll guarantee that but even then it's a risk. Are we that desperate to sign someone?
Only way I go 2 years is with a team option for year 2. He 35 in November. Tops year 1 is $1.5m I'll guarantee that but even then it's a risk. Are we that desperate to sign someone?
Looks like he signed with the Bengals. That's disappointing to me. I think he would have been a good fit. Curious to see the terms.