Packers Early 53 Roster Thread

Nerd said:
I think he might have agreed to stay until Love is ready. Not sure, they gave him a lot last year, and they seem to have a new sympatico. Now they say they are taking it year by year. It's kind of strange.
Click to expand...
Rodgers don't care a fig if Love is ready or how the team fares without him, and he shouldn't, that's not his job.
 
I still feel when Rodgers signed this new deal it was both sides agreeing it was going to be a two year deal. He's 40 years old at end of 2023 and he then retires.
 
GBP4EVER said:
I still feel when Rodgers signed this new deal it was both sides agreeing it was going to be a two year deal. He's 40 years old at end of 2023 and he then retires.
Click to expand...
If it’s a financial thing it’s 3 years, base is still low during that period. Assuming the roster bonuses can be declined makes it seem more of a year to year thing
 
FlaPack said:
If it’s a financial thing it’s 3 years, base is still low during that period. Assuming the roster bonuses can be declined makes it seem more of a year to year thing
Click to expand...
Yeah I can see if Packers have a 8-9 or worse season he says hell to this and walks.
 
FlaPack said:
I don’t think the teams record will be the basis for his decision. More about his physical condition and can / does he want to compete
Click to expand...
If team is going backwards and not a SB cotender does he want to return?
 
rpiotr01 said:
Rodgers don't care a fig if Love is ready or how the team fares without him, and he shouldn't, that's not his job.
Click to expand...
Rodgers didn't have to help Love develop either. Anyway, just saying. We'll see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top