- Messages
- 1,714
- Reaction score
- 683
I am of the belief that if it's one and done, it's a tournament not a playoff(s), hence the title.
So, again, biggest departure is that undefeated conference champs are no longer the automatic highest seeds, which prevents teams like Arkansas State and SDSU from being in the top 4 (like last year (though this year the only teams undefeated in their conferences were Alabama, OU, and WMU)). I had originally gotten that idea from the WIAA (that's how they seed the postseason).
I can put up the sheet showing my seeding thought processes, but a lot of that is on paper so I'd have to scan and upload.
I found the bracketing to be more difficult than the seeding, as the four B1G teams made it difficult. At one point I had Penn St, Ok State, Michigan, and OU in the Midwest, but felt comfortable with the familiar 12/5 matchup and moving the #16 seed out east.
So enjoy! Tell me what you'd have done different (within the parameters of my selection, seeding, and bracketing process), and who you think can run the table to Pasadena!
So, again, biggest departure is that undefeated conference champs are no longer the automatic highest seeds, which prevents teams like Arkansas State and SDSU from being in the top 4 (like last year (though this year the only teams undefeated in their conferences were Alabama, OU, and WMU)). I had originally gotten that idea from the WIAA (that's how they seed the postseason).
I can put up the sheet showing my seeding thought processes, but a lot of that is on paper so I'd have to scan and upload.
I found the bracketing to be more difficult than the seeding, as the four B1G teams made it difficult. At one point I had Penn St, Ok State, Michigan, and OU in the Midwest, but felt comfortable with the familiar 12/5 matchup and moving the #16 seed out east.
So enjoy! Tell me what you'd have done different (within the parameters of my selection, seeding, and bracketing process), and who you think can run the table to Pasadena!