Post Game Bears Beat GB 24-22

realitybytes said:
willis is not great. that's why he is a backup. but when the packers needed a score to get back in the game, he completed a 41-yard pass to get them in scoring position. the poor clock management and the defense gave this game away in the final minute and a half.
Click to expand...
To be frank with you this statement must be sarcastic in nature. Throwing one good pass in no way makes up for his turn over, getting sacked numerous times and just overall shoddy play.

He lost GB this game just as much as he helped. I wasn't a fan of ML coaching today but had the ST not blundered 3 times and Willis actually had any kind of passing ability we win easy.
 
dannobanano said:
To be frank with you this statement must be sarcastic in nature. Throwing one good pass in no way makes up for his turn over, getting sacked numerous times and just overall shoddy play.

He lost GB this game just as much as he helped. I wasn't a fan of ML coaching today but had the ST not blundered 3 times and Willis actually had any kind of passing ability we win easy.
Click to expand...
okay. you're correct. i have seen the light. he's horrible.
 
Crap game by many.

- Receivers: They need some reliable talent at the position. Heath is the most limited, but has the best hands.

- Valentine is an idiot. On the last pass play, he had Bullard behind him and instead of playing tight he went soft on Moore and gave him an easy first down in field goal range.

- Enagbare's slow ass having to get a horse collar early in the drive was a 20-yard swing.

- Willis is a good #2 QB but he looked in over his head today when he had to come in cold without a game plan, thats a redflag.

The OL gave up too much push again. Can't go on without some help there
 
Last play McKinney and Bullard are playing like 20-30 yards back it's like these two think that Chicago can win only on a TD and not a FG so the middle of the field is wide open.
 
GBP4EVER said:
Last play McKinney and Bullard are playing like 20-30 yards back it's like these two think that Chicago can win only on a TD and not a FG so the middle of the field is wide open.
Click to expand...
i have to wonder if that was their decision. it seems more likely that it was a hafley decision. either way it puts a lot of pressure on cbs and lbs to cover. and we all know that our cbs and lbs are weak.
 
realitybytes said:
i have to wonder if that was their decision. it seems more likely that it was a hafley decision. either way it puts a lot of pressure on cbs and lbs to cover. and we all know that our cbs and lbs are weak.
Click to expand...

Maybe Mark can chime in on this.

Why are we rushing only 3 down lineman and we play man to man withe middle of the field wide open? I get keeping the sidelines covered but with 15 seconds if you play our normal zone and make Williams hold the ball a few more seconds it may be incomplete or they don't have time to down it.

Thoughts?
 
realitybytes said:
i have to wonder if that was their decision. it seems more likely that it was a hafley decision. either way it puts a lot of pressure on cbs and lbs to cover. and we all know that our cbs and lbs are weak.
Click to expand...
At least Valentine said he did what he was told, play outside leverage and allow him to complete over the middle.

I think both Hafley and ML suffered from the same thing this year, in that they had some question marks to work with on the roster and instead of pushing them they backed off and got conservative. I don't know who that helps or how it helps players grow and develop when you're trying to hide them every week.
 
ChampionshipBelt said:
Maybe Mark can chime in on this.

Why are we rushing only 3 down lineman and we play man to man withe middle of the field wide open? I get keeping the sidelines covered but with 15 seconds if you play our normal zone and make Williams hold the ball a few more seconds it may be incomplete or they don't have time to down it.

Thoughts?
Click to expand...
My name is not Mark but I also have no bleeping clue about this. Don't rush three. Ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top