- Messages
- 18,349
- Reaction score
- 6,339
can't just go with spices and no meat though.If paying Love clears out the spice rack, the meat will be pretty tasteless
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
can't just go with spices and no meat though.If paying Love clears out the spice rack, the meat will be pretty tasteless
Lots of tough decisions this year. Hopefully, we can keep most of the cupboards stocked.can't just go with spices and no meat though.
I wasn't advocating Barkley, per se, but what we saw is that our offense runs much better with a Jones-type of player (which I believe Barkley is, and when healthy Barkley would be an upgrade).We have seen the market for RB's disintegrate the last few years, where a handful of them were tagged last season but left to the FA market this year. How much more would it cost to get Barkley over Jones? just curious.I hope you're right. The Pack needs Jones - mostly the stuff between his ears that seems to propel his athleticism.
Without Jones, I, seriously, wonder whether big investment in Love is warranted.
I think Fuller and Stone will be on that 2nd level safety. Not get crazy huge money but still in that 5-8 range which is what I think GB will be looking to spend.Interesting article on FA Safeties:
![]()
NFL Scout Helps Rank Top Safeties Capable of Filling Packers’ Biggest Need
The Green Bay Packers’ biggest need entering the offseason undoubtedly is at safety. It’s a critical position in new defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley’s scheme.www.yardbarker.com
McKinney and Fuller stand out to me. Maybe Stone as well.