- Messages
- 17,808
- Reaction score
- 5,875
Still you go to elite program like lsu and they are downAnd how many elite 4-5 star kids are in bad programs? They are bad because they don’t have elite kids
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still you go to elite program like lsu and they are downAnd how many elite 4-5 star kids are in bad programs? They are bad because they don’t have elite kids
Uw little sisters of the poor lolWisconsin better step up the recruiting, Myles Burkett?? A MAC quality QB? Blahhh How about Viny Anthony their stud WR recruit ? Oh yeah he was looking at Army, Air Force, and Duke
I mean for the love of god yes the resources are poor but come on.... That's the best you got PC?
ISU is an elite program? Could have fooled me. One good season does not make them eliteStill you go to elite program like lsu and they are down
LSU does actually find kids that are more highly touted than Wisconsin does. The difference is their conference competition is much tougher than the Big 10. I don't remember the last time, if ever, that Wisconsin graded out with a higher incoming group of kids.ISU is an elite program? Could have fooled me. One good season does not make them elite
LSU is a legacy program so yeah I agree. The post mentioned ISU which is where i had the issue. I would love to have Louisiana, Alabama and Texas as my recruiting footprint as compared to Minnesota, Iowa and IllinoisLSU does actually find kids that are more highly touted than Wisconsin does. The difference is their conference competition is much tougher than the Big 10. I don't remember the last time, if ever, that Wisconsin graded out with a higher incoming group of kids.
I realize that you can't count on the "star system" to truly determine value to a program, but when it's overwhelmingly out of balance, like it is with the SEC vs the average Big 10 school, it's obvious it's an uphill battle.
And this brings up another valid point that every P5 conference is a bit imbalanced now. Until this year Clemson dominated the ACC, Bama and Georgia the SEC, OSU the B1G, Oklahoma the Big 12 and Oregon the PAC 12.LSU does actually find kids that are more highly touted than Wisconsin does. The difference is their conference competition is much tougher than the Big 10. I don't remember the last time, if ever, that Wisconsin graded out with a higher incoming group of kids.
I realize that you can't count on the "star system" to truly determine value to a program, but when it's overwhelmingly out of balance, like it is with the SEC vs the average Big 10 school, it's obvious it's an uphill battle.
LSU gets more kids then UW canISU is an elite program? Could have fooled me. One good season does not make them elite
Thing is you want to compete with the big boys you have to find a way to expand the program to be a OSU who can recurit anywhereLSU is a legacy program so yeah I agree. The post mentioned ISU which is where i had the issue. I would love to have Louisiana, Alabama and Texas as my recruiting footprint as compared to Minnesota, Iowa and Illinois
Schools have tried that before you were born and still cant crack the code on that. OSU has been a national power since 1968 and won a natty in 54.Thing is you want to compete with the big boys you have to find a way to expand the program to be a OSU who can recurit anywhere
well thats obvious and its not rocket science and won a natty in 58, 2003, 2007. I would run over hot coals for their recruiting footprint.LSU gets more kids then UW can