Kizer vs Boyle - Winner take all

I can't see owners willing to give up 5th year or FT on players they got to be able to do something to protect a 1st round investment.
All I can tell you its a major NFLPA issue. Why do they have to protect round 1 investment when teams have $50m in cap space laying around, and the tag system is a major issue .....dont want to hijack the thread,
 
All I can tell you its a major NFLPA issue. Why do they have to protect round 1 investment when teams have $50m in cap space laying around, and the tag system is a major issue .....dont want to hijack the thread,
NFLPA won't give a crap about rookies as long as the owners through a little more cash the vets way.
 
Very apparent after tonight's game who the better QB is.

Absolutely no comparison between the two. When they finally gave Boyle his shot, he showed he was far superior. Let's hope the coaching staff realizes it, and moves on from Kizer. He's pathetic.
 
Do you think that possibly the coaching staff and management knew Boyle was better all along and was trying to give Kizer an opportunity to something / anything that might make him a tradeable asset?
 
As guy on radio today said you want a backup to be able to come in win 2 out of 3 games if your starter goes down. Kizer nor Boyle could do that. Packers have failed to address getting a decent QB. Boyle and Kizer will be bottom 5 if not bottom 3 backups in NFL for whoever gets job.
 
Back
Top