Packers 2015 free agency preview: Is there room to retain both Nick Perry & Mike Neal at OLB?

Da-news-now

RSS Reporter
Reporter
Member
Messages
5,407
Reaction score
311
usa-today-9050942.0.jpg

There may not be room for everyone at outside linebacker to return if coach Mike McCarthy puts Clay Matthews back there full-time in 2016.

Over the next two weeks, Acme Packing Company takes a look at each position group on the Green Bay Packers and provides grades and insight on how they performed in the 2015 season. Today, we examine the outside linebackers. [BCOLOR=#ffffff]Follow along with all of our positional breakdowns here[/BCOLOR].

The Green Bay Packers' outside linebacker unit will likely look much different in 2016 than it did this season. First of all, Clay Matthews is expected to move back to his original role as a pass-rusher rather than spending much of his time at inside linebacker. Secondly, the Packers have two key members of the position group set to hit unrestricted free agency and a third rotational and special teams player who will likely hit the market as well.

All of these factors combine to throw the position into a bit of flux for 2016.

Nick Perry


Years in NFL: 4
Status: Unrestricted free agent
Expiring contract: Four-year rookie contract, $7,499,250 total
Stats: 31 total tackles, 3.5 sacks, one forced fumble

Drafted in the first round in 2012 out of USC, it is fair to say that Perry never quite lived up to his draft status. He managed to avoid the "bust" tag, but he never turned into more than a role player in his four years in Green Bay. Heading into the 2015 season, Ted Thompson declined to pick up the fifth-year option on his rookie deal, perhaps a sign of things to come. With Julius Peppers likely to return for his third season with the Packers and Clay Matthews potentially returning to a full-time role on the outside, there may not be enough room for a guy who never grew into a starting role.

Mike Neal


Years in NFL: 6
Status: Unrestricted free agent
Expiring contract: 2 years, $8 million
Stats: 36 total tackles, four sacks, one forced fumble

Neal is finishing his second contract with the Packers. The first part of his career was plagued with injuries, but just completed his third consecutive healthy season. Neal was the biggest beneficiary in 2015 when Dom Capers decided to limit Peppers' snaps in an effort to keep him fresh. While his numbers have never jumped off the page, he filled in well when Peppers was on the sideline and Matthews was in the middle. There may not be a starting role available on paper for 2016, but he is a good depth guy to have. Beyond Peppers and Matthews, Jayrone Elliott has earned more of a look on the outside. The team also experimented with Datone Jones playing the outside in 2015. Looking ahead, it is hard to see Thompson bringing back both Neal and Perry. If the team decides to keep one, it is hard to imagine taking Perry over Neal.

Andy Mulumba


Years in NFL: 3
Status: Restricted free agent
Expiring contract: three years, $1.49 million
Stats: 4 total tackles

Mulumba, a primary special teams player, played in just six games in 2015 after tearing his ACL the year before. It is hard to project his future role with the organization, if there is one. Undrafted out of college, he has never been asked to play a major role outside of special teams. Based on Thompson's tendency to retain his own, there is a strong possibility he will be given a qualifying offer. The question remains if another team will make an offer as well.

Continue reading @http://www.acmepackingcompany.com/ ...
 
Technically there is room for all 3 of them but if they are truly behind moving CM3 to OLB then you are just wasting money by signing both and keeping Peppers. Now, if you decide to cut Peppers,well then you might try hard to sign them both, but there are no signs that's part of the plan. Would have to agree that keeping Neal makes the most sense. Still hope an OLB becomes available in the draft.
 
Let Perry walk. He's never been a fit in a 3-4 let him go be a DE in a 4-3
 
Perry has played well the last couple years, I would keep him here. If they dont bring back both, Neal would be the odd guy out.
 
A Zen-like question... if Perry leaves, how will we notice?
He's been our best run D OLB for two years in a row... We may not notice, but opposing RBs could.

One weird thing about Perry and Datone Jones: For 1st rounders, they've had about zero media exposure or -appeal. I can't recall one article with a good interview from Perry. Datone is no publicity marvel, either. If you remember any good stories on them, please share!

I guess a draft hit is big news, a total draft bust is big bad news. An OK draft pick... Meh.

I've browsed the Seahawks forums about Bruce Irvin, since when I look at UFAs, I like to know what people who have watched a player most think of them. I seriously LOL'd when reading seahawks.net -forum's Irvin -thread: "Bruce should go to a 3-4 team", "I also think that money would be better spent on a...", "either he stays on a reasonable deal or he leaves with a boatload of money and gets a comp pick", "no reason to devote that type of contract to Irvin"....

Replace "Irvin" with "Perry", and 3-4 for 4-3, and you get the EXACT same conversation we're having over Perry
icon_biggrin.gif
 
He's been our best run D OLB for two years in a row... We may not notice, but opposing RBs could.

One weird thing about Perry and Datone Jones: For 1st rounders, they've had about zero media exposure or -appeal. I can't recall one article with a good interview from Perry. Datone is no publicity marvel, either. If you remember any good stories on them, please share!

I guess a draft hit is big news, a total draft bust is big bad news. An OK draft pick... Meh.


I've browsed the Seahawks forums about Bruce Irvin, since when I look at UFAs, I like to know what people who have watched a player most think of them. I seriously LOL'd when reading seahawks.net -forum's Irvin -thread: "Bruce should go to a 3-4 team", "I also think that money would be better spent on a...", "either he stays on a reasonable deal or he leaves with a boatload of money and gets a comp pick", "no reason to devote that type of contract to Irvin"....

Replace "Irvin" with "Perry", and 3-4 for 4-3, and you get the EXACT same conversation we're having over Perry
icon_biggrin.gif

Yup, pretty much. What else would one expect?
 
Back
Top